RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02488
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) test score dated 30 Apr 12, be
declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management
System (AFFMS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to a medical ailment, he did not complete his FA test.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to void
his 30 Apr 12, FA test score. However, due to his AF Form 422,
Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status,
exempting him from the 1.5 mile run, the cardio component of the
contested FA should be changed to reflect exempt in the AAFMS.
Members overall score will now reflect 79.50 (unsatisfactory)
due to his failure to meet the minimum required in sit-ups.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 7 Aug 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error and injustice to warrant
partial relief. While we note the applicant requests that his
entire Fitness Assessment dated 30 Apr 12, be removed from the
AFFMS, the AF Form 422 only exempts him from the 1.5 mile run.
Therefore, we find no basis to recommend removing his FA.
However, we are in agreement with DPISMs recommendation to only
exempt the cardio portion of his FA. We note that this will
still result in an unsatisfactory score. In view of the above,
we recommend the applicants records be corrected only to the
extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio
portion of his Fitness Assessment, dated 30 Apr 12, reflect
exempt in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 28 Mar 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the record as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2012-
02488:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jun 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 29 Jun 12, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Aug 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02388
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There was a discrepancy between restrictions placed on his AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 19 Apr 2012 and the testing exemptions reflected on the AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, dated 20 Apr 2012. On 23 Apr 2012, he took his copy of the AF Form 422 to his scheduled FA. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02331
On 2 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Feb 14, applicant provided a memorandum in rebuttal of AFPC/DPSIM and FAAB memoranda. While we note an...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04244
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of his request to remove the contested FAs; however, they recommend updating the AFFMS to reflect Exempt for the cardio component. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 March 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02364
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 Feb 10 31 Aug 10 * 14 Sep 11 27 Oct 11 2 Feb 12 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ , Panel Chair , Member , Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and sit-up components of the Fitness Assessment dated 14 Sep 11 be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01644
IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier. On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01664
IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier. On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04970
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of his 7 Jul 11 FA be updated to reflect he was exempt in the AFFMS noting the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, indicates the applicant had a preexisting condition which precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score; and the AF Form 422,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2013-00808
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00808 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 25 Oct 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591
On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment. On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05468
A commander can only recommend the removal of a fitness score when a member is unable to complete the FA due to a medical condition which is validated by a medical provider. In this case, after the applicant sustained his injury, there is no indication a medical provider exempted him from any components of the FA or that his commander invalidated the test. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...